Some people don't think rating women's looks is useful, but I still think it's got merit. I used to like the "would do, and brag; would do and keep quite; wouldn't do even if you paid me" method, but it doesn't really communicate the quality you regard the woman in terms of looks, presentation, character, or whatever. Instead of ranking girls on a scale of 1 to 10, I came up with this today because I needed something more granular to compare this one chick a few of us at work know to some celebrities a coworker named for reference. I put the girl at a 6.5 and my coworker put Mila Kunis at a 10, but to me she's an 8 or 8.5. He figured that meant that the girl we were talking about wasn't that far off from what he'd consider a 10, but in reality she way less attractive--in my book a 6 is a huge difference from an 8. On to the new system....
On a scale of 1-100 the girl I know was a 68 and Kunis is an 88 IMO. Imagine those like school grades with anything under a 60 "failing" (to be attractive at all).
Kunis = B+
Girl I know = D+
I think this is a much better way to articulate how we perceive one's qualities than a simple 1-10 rating.
90-100 = A
80-89 = B
70-79 = C
60-69 = D
1-59 = F
Also, if they're on the low end of a letter grade give them a minus (-) and if they're on the high end of a grade give them a plus (+).
On a scale of 1-100 the girl I know was a 68 and Kunis is an 88 IMO. Imagine those like school grades with anything under a 60 "failing" (to be attractive at all).
Kunis = B+
Girl I know = D+
I think this is a much better way to articulate how we perceive one's qualities than a simple 1-10 rating.
90-100 = A
80-89 = B
70-79 = C
60-69 = D
1-59 = F
Also, if they're on the low end of a letter grade give them a minus (-) and if they're on the high end of a grade give them a plus (+).
